France–Netherlands — The Riviera Private Wealth Brief

0Executive summary

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus

1The France–Netherlands convention — 1973, modernised

The relationship rests on a single instrument: the convention of 16 March 1973, signed at Paris, in force since 29 March 1974, which replaced the post-war text of 1949. It has been amended once — the avenant of 7 April 2004, in force since 24 July 2005, whose substance is an aviation carve-out negotiated for the Dutch flag carrier — and it carries, in its consolidated presentation, the multilateral instrument, in force for France since 1 January 2019 and for the Netherlands since 1 July 2019, including the principal-purpose test, under which a treaty advantage can be refused where obtaining it was a principal object of an arrangement. The convention applies to taxes on income and on fortune: the Dutch list of article 2 names the vermogensbelasting alongside the income taxes, while the French list of 1973 holds income taxes alone, France then levying no wealth tax; the convention extends to future taxes of identical or analogous nature (article 2 §4), and the administration's current table of conventions in force records the relationship as covered for taxes on income and on fortune alike. Section I returns to what that means for the IFI.

Residence does the sorting. A person within the tax of both states is assigned by article 4: liability by reason of domicile, residence or an analogous criterion, then — for individuals claimed by both states — the familiar cascade of permanent home, centre of vital interests, habitual abode, nationality and mutual agreement. The Conseil d'État confirmed in September 2025, on this convention, that a residence certificate issued by the Dutch administration under article 4 suffices for treaty entitlement, without any further showing that the tax was effectively borne. The authentic texts are French and Dutch, both equally authoritative; this brief quotes the French consolidation.

The Dutch side keeps its own accents. The Netherlands has levied no net wealth tax since 2001, taxing private investment assets instead through the box-3 deemed-return regime; it charges inheritance and gift duty by reference to the residence of the deceased or donor, with a ten-year tail for Dutch nationals who emigrate; and its succession law gives children the legitieme portie, a claim in money rather than a share of the estate in kind. This brief states Dutch law at orientation level only; its verified ground is the French side and the convention, and the Dutch reading belongs with the family's Dutch advisers.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus · 1973 convention (CML consolidation) arts. 1, 2, 4; avenant 7 Apr 2004 (protocol pt. VI); CE 30 Sept 2025 n° 490793; BOI-ANNX-000306 (29 Apr 2026); BOI-INT-CVB-NLD (early-vintage substance — the text prevails)

2The market seen from the Netherlands

Seen from the Netherlands, the Riviera's €3M+ villa market leads with the Saint-Tropez peninsula, the largest register of the coast: 1006 qualified sales for €7,049M across 2014–2025, at a €4.9M median and a €85.5M ceiling. Cannes and its hills — the Super Cannes quarter on the Vallauris side included — contributed 306 sales for €2,066M at the same €4.9M median, while Saint-Jean-Cap-Ferrat remains the narrowest and most expensive register: 178 sales for €2,375M at a €6.5M median and a €200.0M ceiling. The past 36 months alone account for €3,970M across the three.

Source: DVF (« Demandes de Valeurs Foncières », DGFiP), villa sales ≥ €3M, 2014–2025, estate-deduplicated — the same convention as the published Riviera Intelligence hub, so this brief and the public pages cannot disagree. DVF through 2025-12-31.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus · DVF register, estate-deduplicated

IBuying in France as a Dutch resident

The process and its costs

The acquisition follows the standard French sequence: offer, compromis de vente with a ten-day cooling-off period, deposit of customarily 10%, conditions precedent, and the authentic deed before the notaire, who collects the duties and registers title. The notaire acts as a public officer rather than as the buyer's counsel, and Dutch buyers typically retain their own advisers in addition. Because the annual wealth tax, the gains regime and French death duty each read a holding structure differently in this relationship, the structure questions of section I bis deserve to be answered before the compromis is signed; the acquiring vehicle is difficult to change once the process is under way.

The cost of owning

CGI article 964 institutes the annual tax on real-estate wealth above €1,300,000 of taxable assets. For persons not domiciled in France the base comprises French-situs property together with the fraction of any company's shares representing French property (article 964-2°), and for the directly-held villa the treaty position is settled rather than absent: article 23 §1 of the convention assigns French-situs immovable fortune to France, so a Dutch-resident owner bears the IFI with the treaty's confirmation rather than its shelter. The exposure is one-sided in practice: the Netherlands has levied no net wealth tax since 2001, and under article 24 A the Dutch side relieves French-taxed fortune by exemption with progression, so the IFI is a French cost of carry rather than a double charge. Where the villa is held through a company, the treaty analysis changes character; that question belongs to section I bis.

For the family weighing a full move to France, French law itself provides a calendar: a person who becomes French-resident after five years abroad is taxed, for the five years that follow, on French assets only (article 964-1°, al. 2). In this relationship the window rests on the French statute alone — the 1973 convention contains no counterpart to the five-year clauses France has granted in certain other treaties — so it carries the ordinary reservation that a statute can be revised the same way it was made. The calendar of a move is nonetheless worth planning against it.

Recurring charges follow the property. Taxe foncière runs at communal rates; for furnished secondary residences, communes in the zone tendue — a category that includes the marquee Riviera communes — may vote a surtaxe on the taxe d'habitation for second homes, and the annual occupancy declaration is required of all owners. Because these rates are communal and year-specific, this brief's edition cycle re-verifies them rather than freezing them.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus · CGI arts. 964–965; 1973 convention arts. 23 §1, 24 A; cost scales stated for orientation, itemised at engagement

I bisStructures, as questions

The structure question

Holding structures are presented here, in keeping with this line's doctrine, as questions for analysis rather than as recommendations. For a Dutch buyer the analysis carries one organising fact, stated in the executive summary and worth restating precisely: the convention's gains article has read through property-rich companies since 1973, and French death duty does the same by domestic law, while the fortune article stops at the villa itself — its residual rule allocates every other element of fortune, company shares included, to the residence state exclusively (article 23 §4), and the protocol's reservation on transparent co-ownership companies names articles 6 and 13 only. The administration's published commentary on this convention does not address the fortune article at all, and the principal-purpose test now attached to the convention, together with the disclosure discipline of the 3% entity tax, frames any arrangement examined in its light. What follows is therefore a map of questions for counsel, not a route.

Debt against the IFI — what the code anticipates

The financing conversation runs as it does elsewhere on this coast: a loan from the buyer's bank, secured on a pledged portfolio, so that liquidity remains invested while the debt reduces the taxable base. The mechanics are lawful and the code anticipates them. Acquisition debt owed to a bank is deductible from the IFI base under CGI article 974, while financial assets sit outside that base altogether. The boundaries are three. Loans repaying capital at term are deemed to amortise, the deduction declining pro rata over the loan's life, and by one twentieth a year where no term is fixed. Where taxable property exceeds €5M and debts exceed 60% of its value, the excess is deductible only as to half, unless the borrower shows the loan was not contracted mainly for tax. And the debt must be real — actually drawn, actually serviced, at market terms; routed through a shareholder account of an SCI it ceases to count for valuing the shares (article 973). Leverage moderates the IFI in its early years and fades by design — a calendar best examined before the compromis rather than after.

What the acquisition decides for succession — and for gifts

No France–Netherlands succession or gift convention exists, so each side applies its own law in full. On the French side CGI article 750 ter draws the map: the villa is always within French duty as French-situs property, whether held directly or through interposed entities whose assets are principally French real estate; where the deceased was not French-domiciled, French assets alone are reached (750 ter 2°); and where an heir has been French-domiciled for at least six of the ten years preceding the transmission, the reach extends to that heir's worldwide inheritance (750 ter 3°). Article 784 A then credits foreign death duty, but only against the tax on assets situated outside France — on the villa itself the French charge is undiminished. The Dutch side taxes by reference to the deceased or donor: erfbelasting where the deceased was Dutch-resident, with the ten-year tail for Dutch nationals after emigration, Dutch law granting its own unilateral relief for the French duty on the villa — the mechanics of that relief belong with the family's Dutch advisers.

Where French duty applies, the scale is that of CGI article 777: progressive to 45% in the direct line beyond €1.8M per share, after the €100,000 per-child allowance of article 779, with the surviving spouse exempt in succession. Before either state determines the duty, the civil law determines who inherits, and here the relationship is well equipped: both states apply EU Regulation 650/2012, so a Dutch national habitually resident in France may elect Dutch law for the succession as a whole. The election changes the mechanics more than it removes the children's position — Dutch law gives children the legitieme portie, a monetary claim of half the intestate share, where French law reserves a share of the estate itself — and the fiscal allocation described above is unaffected by it. The choice of law, the matrimonial regime carried into the purchase, and the calendar of any gifts are questions for counsel on both sides, best answered before the compromis.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus · CGI arts. 669, 750 ter, 751, 777, 779, 784 A, 968, 973–974, 990 D–990 E, 990 J, 1649 AB; 1973 convention arts. 13 §1, 23 §§1, 4, protocol pt. II; EU Reg. 650/2012

IISelling as a Dutch resident

France taxes first, and on this point the 1973 text was already modern: article 13 §1 assigns gains on French immovables to France and, in the same sentence, gains on shares and comparable interests in a company whose assets are principally French real estate — a property-rich clause the convention has carried since signature, which the multilateral instrument sharpened with the 365-day look-back and extended to interests in partnerships and trusts. For a Dutch-resident seller the French charge runs under CGI article 244 bis A: the taxable gain is reduced by an ownership-duration allowance of 6% for each year of ownership beyond the fifth and 4% for the twenty-second (article 150 VC), the income-tax component then applying at 19% (article 200 B) and extinguishing after 22 years, while the social levies extinguish after 30 and follow the seller's social-security affiliation — for owners within the European social-security coordination, generally at the reduced solidarity rate, verified at engagement. Taxable gains above €50,000 bear in addition the progressive surcharge of article 1609 nonies G, which reaches 6% at the levels this market transacts. The Netherlands being a member state of the European Union, the accredited fiscal-representation requirement borne by third-country sellers does not arise (article 244 bis A, IV bis).

The Dutch side then stands back. Gains taxable in France under article 13 §§1 and 2 are relieved by the Netherlands through the proportional reduction of article 24 A — exemption with progression — and Dutch law in any event taxes private investment property through the box-3 deemed return rather than on realised gains, so a Dutch household selling the villa ordinarily faces no separate Dutch charge on the sale; how the exemption is returned in the Dutch declaration belongs with the family's Dutch advisers. Whether the sale is of the asset or of the shares changes the pool of buyers and the French analysis, while France's right to tax survives in either form; that choice is best evaluated before marketing begins rather than in the course of negotiation.

Leaving after the sale — a note on the exit tax

Families who sell and then move away from France sometimes ask whether an exit charge applies on departure. The answer is narrower than the name suggests. France's exit tax (CGI article 167 bis) is aimed at securities, not at property: it concerns persons who were French-domiciled for at least six of the ten years before leaving, and taxes the unrealised gains on substantial securities holdings — positions whose combined value exceeds €800,000, or stakes of 50% or more in a company's profits, the second criterion catching a controlling holding whatever its value — as they stand on the day of departure. A villa already sold has settled its own tax under the regimes above, and the sale proceeds themselves are not within the charge. Shares of a family SCI follow the property rather than the portfolio: so long as the company keeps the ordinary income-tax regime, gains on its property-rich shares remain within the real-estate regime (CGI article 150 UB) and outside the exit tax — the French right to tax a later sale being preserved instead by article 244 bis A. A company that has opted for corporation tax changes the classification, and with it the analysis; the option belongs on the pre-departure checklist. The residence clock matters equally: a person who leaves before six years of French domicile within the preceding ten stands outside the latent-gains charge altogether, so the family that tried France for a few years and moved on typically departs untouched; gains already placed under a tax deferral follow their own rules and are reviewed at engagement. Where the machinery does apply, payment is generally deferred, and the assessment lapses automatically where the securities are still held two years after departure — five where the portfolio exceeded €2.57M — or upon a return to France. The relationship adds a mirror-image note of its own: under article 13 §5 of the convention, each state keeps the right to tax gains on substantial participations in its own companies realised by its own nationals who were its residents at any time in the five years before the sale — the clause under which a Dutch family recently arrived in France keeps a Dutch tail on gains from a Dutch BV, a calendar their Dutch advisers will know well.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus · 1973 convention arts. 13 §§1, 5, 24 A; CGI arts. 150 UB, 150 VC, 167 bis, 200 B, 244 bis A (incl. IV bis), 1609 nonies G

IIIRenting — as tenant and as owner

Renting as a tenant

A rental year before purchase remains the classic first step, and it carries one caution worth stating clearly: French tax domicile under CGI article 4 B turns on the location of the foyer, the principal place of stay, and the centres of professional and economic interest — none of which defers to a lease. A Riviera villa that becomes the family's effective home can establish French residence, with worldwide consequences, well before any purchase; where both states then claim the same person, the cascade of article 4 of the convention — permanent home, centre of vital interests, habitual abode, nationality — does the sorting. The choice between furnished seasonal lettings and the one-to-three-year civil lease determines exit flexibility, and is best matched to the trial's real purpose.

Renting the villa out

French-source rental income of non-residents — the furnished lettings common at this price point included — is taxed under the minimum-rate regime of CGI article 197 A, at no less than 20% up to the second-bracket ceiling and 30% above it, unless the taxpayer demonstrates a lower worldwide effective rate; social levies apply in addition, at a rate that depends on the owner's social-security affiliation, for Dutch-affiliated owners generally the reduced solidarity rate, verified at engagement. The convention assigns the income to France as the state where the property stands (article 6), and the Netherlands relieves it by exemption with progression under article 24 A — in the box-3 mechanics, the French villa is in practice excluded from the Dutch charge; how the exemption is returned on the Dutch side belongs with the family's Dutch advisers.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus · CGI arts. 4 B, 197 A; 1973 convention arts. 4, 6, 24 A

4What changed

Edition 1 — baseline (July 2026). The instruments as they stand: the convention of 16 March 1973, in force since 29 March 1974, as amended by the avenant of 7 April 2004 (in force 24 July 2005) and modified by the multilateral instrument, in force for France since 1 January 2019 and for the Netherlands since 1 July 2019. The Dutch finance ministry's published list of treaty negotiations for 2025 does not include France, so no successor instrument is in preparation on either side's public record; this brief will track any change of that position. Further watch items for edition 2: annual Loi de finances movements on the IFI and transfer duties; communal surtaxe votes on the Riviera arc; the administration's table of conventions in force (re-issued April 2026, the classification this brief relies on for the wealth-tax question); Dutch legislation on box 3, which is in reform; and any refresh of the administration's commentary on this convention, whose substance predates the 2004 avenant and the multilateral instrument and which is silent on the immovables, gains and fortune articles.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus

5Questions, answered

Does a Dutch resident pay French wealth tax on a Riviera villa?

Yes, once French real-estate assets exceed €1.3M (CGI art. 964). The 1973 convention covers taxes on fortune and assigns French-situs immovable wealth to France (art. 23 §1), so the charge on the directly-held villa is confirmed by treaty; the Netherlands has levied no net wealth tax since 2001, so it is never doubled. Company-held structures raise a distinct treaty question, examined with counsel.

Is there a France–Netherlands succession or gift convention?

No. Death and gifts are governed by each state's domestic law: French duty always reaches the villa as French-situs property (CGI art. 750 ter), including through property-rich companies, and extends to an heir's worldwide inheritance where that heir has been French-resident for six of the preceding ten years; the Netherlands taxes where the deceased or donor was Dutch-resident, with a ten-year tail for Dutch nationals.

Who taxes the gain when a Dutch resident sells a French villa?

France, as the state where the property stands (1973 convention, art. 13 §1) — including on sales of shares of property-rich companies, a clause the treaty has carried since 1973 — under CGI article 244 bis A with the ownership-duration allowances, the income-tax component extinguishing after 22 years and the social levies after 30. The Netherlands exempts the gain with progression (art. 24 A) and levies no tax of its own on private realised gains.

Is rental income from France taxed if the owner lives in the Netherlands?

Yes, by France: the convention assigns income from immovable property to the state where it stands (art. 6), and France applies the minimum-rate regime of CGI article 197 A, at no less than 20% and 30%, with social levies in addition. The Netherlands exempts the income with progression under article 24 A; in box-3 practice the French villa is excluded from the Dutch charge.

Can a Dutch owner's heirs keep Dutch succession law?

Largely, yes. Both states apply EU Regulation 650/2012, so a Dutch national habitually resident in France may elect Dutch law for the succession as a whole. Dutch law itself gives children the legitieme portie — a monetary claim of half the intestate share — rather than the French réserve in kind, and the election leaves the fiscal allocation untouched: French duty still reaches the villa.

Does a bank loan reduce French wealth tax on a Riviera villa?

Yes. Acquisition debt owed to a bank is deductible from the IFI base under CGI article 974, and pledged financial assets remain outside the tax altogether. The deduction is bounded: interest-only loans are deemed to amortise each year, and where property exceeds €5M and debt exceeds 60% of its value, the excess counts only as to half unless a mainly non-tax purpose is shown.

Does a French exit tax apply after selling and leaving?

Rarely, and never on the villa itself. The charge (CGI art. 167 bis) reaches only persons French-domiciled for six of the ten years before departure, and only their unrealised gains on securities — above €800,000 in value, or stakes of 50% or more of a company's profits; the sold villa and its proceeds stand outside, as do family-SCI shares kept under the ordinary income-tax regime (art. 150 UB). Where it does apply, payment is generally deferred and the assessment lapses after two years — five above €2.57M — or upon return to France.

What should a Dutch buyer ask before holding through a BV, STAK or SCI?

Three things, with counsel: the annual 3% entity tax and its disclosure filings (CGI arts. 990 D–990 E; EU entities are exempt on filing); how the fortune article's allocation of company shares to the residence state meets the French annual tax's look-through — a treaty question the administration's commentary does not address, framed by the convention's anti-abuse rule; and the certainty that neither a company nor a foundation moves the villa outside French death duty (CGI art. 750 ter).

What is the Chiron Legal Corpus?

The Chiron Legal Corpus is the research library behind this brief, maintained by this office's offshore legal-research partner: an extensive cross-border collection of consolidated statutes, tax-authority doctrine, treaty instruments and case law, including the French primary sources in full text. Every statement of law in these pages is verified against it, re-checked against Légifrance and BOFiP at each edition, and stamped with its review date section by section.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus

6Methodology, sources & qualifications

Method. Legal statements are verified against the Chiron Legal Corpus, the research library maintained by this office's offshore legal-research partner — an extensive cross-border and international collection of consolidated statutes, tax-authority doctrine, treaty instruments and case law, including French primary law held in full text and re-checked against the official sources at each edition. The review of 19 July 2026 covered Légifrance (CGI arts. 4 B, 150 UB, 150 VC, 167 bis, 197 A, 200 B, 244 bis A, 669, 750 ter, 751, 777, 779, 784 A, 964–965, 968, 973–974, 990 D–990 E, 990 J, 1609 nonies G, 1649 AB — consolidated texts) and the treaty in its official French presentations: the 1973 convention as amended by the 2004 avenant, and its consolidation with the multilateral instrument — the authentic texts being French and Dutch. The administration's classification of the convention as covering taxes on income and on fortune is taken from its table of conventions in force as re-issued on 29 April 2026; its commentary on this convention predates, in substance, everything after the convention's early years and does not address the immovables, gains or fortune articles — on those points this brief follows the treaty text. The Conseil d'État's decision of 30 September 2025 (n° 490793) is cited from the official report. The Dutch treaty-status position is taken from the Dutch finance ministry's published 2025 negotiation list; Dutch domestic law is stated at orientation level from secondary sources and is never load-bearing for a legal claim. Market data: DVF (DGFiP), villa sales ≥ €3M, estate-deduplicated, register through 2025-12-31. Items flagged "at engagement" — communal rates, social-levy affiliation, the Dutch return of exempted income, the deed-level gain base — are stated at mechanism level pending case-specific verification.

Qualification. This brief documents published law and public transaction data; it is research rather than personalised legal or tax advice, and individual circumstances — residence history, nationality, matrimonial regime, the chain of title — change outcomes. For a live transaction, this office coordinates the appropriate French counsel (avocat fiscaliste, notaire) and executes the property side.

Law reviewed as at 19 July 2026 — verified against Légifrance and BOFiP through the Chiron Legal Corpus

Further intelligence

The Riviera villa market — the coast-wide €3M+ index

Riviera property tax & relocation — the incoming buyer's primer

France–Nordics — the convention pair

France–USA — the convention pair

Nederlandse editie